Andi Kleen wrote:
> For me you don't need anymore, but possibly for others.
>
Hm. I'm not a fan of the great big monolithic patch myself, but on the
other hand I don't like the idea of patches which are not self-contained
steps from working->working state. Xen-core.patch is currently the
(more or less) minimal set of stuff which needs to be in place to get
working Xen guest up, and so from that perspective I don't think there's
a good way of splitting it up.
> To summarize the outstanding issues are:
> - fixing sched_clock first
>
What was the sched_clock problem? I don't remember and outstanding
issues with it. I noticed you didn't take paravirt-sched_clock.
> - hopefully more review of the core pieces by others
> - what i commented (minor stuff mostly)
>
I just rebased onto your newest patches, so I'll address your comments
and repost.
> - review of xenbus and drivers
Yes, not much response there.
J
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
