Re: [PATCH 09/25] xen: Account for time stolen by Xen

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/25] xen: Account for time stolen by Xen
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:40:53 -0700
Cc: virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, lkml <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, john stultz <johnstul@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <200704252015.06269.ak@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302)

Andi Kleen wrote:
> Then the barrier shouldn't be needed at all? 
>   

We still need to prevent compiler reordering.

> Anyways needs comments
>   

Yep.

    J
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

References:
- [PATCH 00/25] xen: Xen implementation for paravirt_ops
  - From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [PATCH 09/25] xen: Account for time stolen by Xen
  - From: Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH 09/25] xen: Account for time stolen by Xen
  - From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [PATCH 09/25] xen: Account for time stolen by Xen
  - From: Andi Kleen

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 09/25] xen: Account for time stolen by Xen
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 11/25] xen: Xen SMP guest support
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 09/25] xen: Account for time stolen by Xen
Next by thread: [PATCH 11/25] xen: Xen SMP guest support
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM Development] [Libvirt Development] [Libvirt Users] [CentOS Virtualization] [Netdev] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite Forum] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba]

Powered by Linux