Matt Mackall wrote:
> I think adding a flags field and an allocate flag to my callback
> struct would be sufficient here.
>
Yes, probably.
What about something that wants to shatter superpages?
> The syntax is horrible, but I don't think we end up using the
> resultant type enough to justify the namespace pollution.
>
Don't know that that's a huge concern. The typedef namespace (*_t) is
pretty empty, and its not like we're talking about something that's
visible outside the kernel. And the syntax is *really* ugly.
J
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
