* Zachary Amsden (zach@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > >Why not submit a patch to do what you need here? (The Geode comment is > >a bit worrying though.) > > Why should VMI add workaround into PIT code? I'm not sure it's a workaround, seems more like a subtle diff (perhaps it's just an oversight). I need to rectify it anyway when merging in the x86_64 version. It's the way the x86_64 code is working already. Shutdown for most clockevents tells device to stop ticking. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
