Re: New CPUID/MSR driver; virtualization hooks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Zachary Amsden (zach@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >
> >I actually expect rdmsr/wrmsr to have a higher likelihood of weird 
> >things.  I don't know how many hypervisors can trap and handle those.
> 
> Or implement anything useful at all ... perhaps it might be useful to 
> simply wrap them with an -ENOSYS in some cases.
> 
> Rusty, Jeremy. Chris - any feedback on MSR support?

Drop 'em as far as I'm concerned.  T&E works fine, need to double check
lguest.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux