Rusty Russell wrote:
> You'll still have the damage inflicted on gcc's optimizer, though.
Well, I could remove the clobbers for PVOP_CALL[0-2] and add the
appropriate push/pops, and put similar push/pop wrappers around all the
called functions. But it doesn't make it any prettier.
J
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
