On Wednesday 28 March 2007 21:18, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Wednesday 28 March 2007 00:13, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > > > >> smp_call_function and smp_call_function_single are almost complete > >> duplicates of the same logic. This patch combines them by > >> implementing them in terms of the more general > >> smp_call_function_mask(). > >> > > > > I think I got those already. > > > > OK. Do you have smp_ops and machine_ops? Not yet. Can you resend the current set? > There's a doc update patch too: Can you send that separately after i sync out please? Thanks -Andi _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
