Re: [patch 1/2] Ignore stolen time in the softlockup watchdog

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeremy Fitzhardinge a écrit :

> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long long, touch_timestamp);

...

>  void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void)
>  {
> -	__raw_get_cpu_var(touch_timestamp) = jiffies;
> +	__raw_get_cpu_var(touch_timestamp) = sched_clock();
>  }

Not very clear if this is safe on 32bit, since this is not anymore atomic.

Maybe a comment would help ?


_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux