* Jeremy Fitzhardinge (jeremy@xxxxxxxx) wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > but only as a cleanup of the current open-coded (void *) casts. My > > problem with this is that it loses the types. Not that there is much to > > check for, but still, this adds some assumptions about how function > > calls look like. > > I agree. I don't generally like this kind of hack, but having a single > test for "func == paravirt_nop" to look for nop pv_ops in the patcher is > what tipped the balance. how about __paravirt_nop_start < func < __paravirt_nop_end and preserve the types? thanks, -chris _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
