Re: [patch 00/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Xen guest implementation for paravirt_ops interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   
>>  * virtual block device (blockfront)
>>  * virtual network device (netfront)
>>     
>
> note, these drivers should be submitted through the proper block drivers 
> and network drivers review process - not via the x86_64 tree.
>   

Yes; who should look at them?  I posted netfront to net-dev, and Stephen
Hemminger commented on it on the last repost, but I'd love them to get
more scrutiny.

Obviously they're not actually useful without Xen (and vice-versa), so
there's not much point in committing them separately.

    J
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux