Re: Stolen and degraded time and schedulers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> How would you deal with something like a pentium 4 HT processor where
> you may run slower just because you got scheduled on the sibling of a
> cpu that happens to run something else needing the same execution units
> you do, causing you to get delayed more, even though the cpu is running
> full speed and nothing else is trying to use your "cpu"?  I don't think
> there is any way to know what the real impact of two processes on a HT
> cpu have on each other.
>
> Interesting goal.  Not sure it can be done.

You're right.  That's a very tough case.  I don't know if there's any
way to do a reasonable estimate of the slowdown.  You could handwave it
and say "if both threads are running a process, then apply an X scaling
factor to their rate of progress".  That might be enough.

    J
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux