On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 13:34 -0800, Dan Hecht wrote: > On 03/07/2007 01:40 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 13:07 -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > > That would certainly be ideal. We'll look at the xen, vmi, lguest and > >> kvm paravirtualized time models and see how much they really have in > >> common. I'm a bit curious about how vmi's time events make their way > >> back into the system. > > > > By the crude mechanism I'm fighting. > > > > Hmm? They make there way back via interrupts. How is that crude? Simply because you _ABUSE_ timer_init_hook() to set it up. Keep it self contained and do not impose restrictions on the kernel core code, which we have to maintain. tglx _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
