Ingo Molnar wrote:
> /For you/ it's certainly no big deal, you dont have to fix it up and you
> dont have to keep it flexible ;)
>
How flexible does it need to be? Its a simple time source and event
driver. How flexible does the pit driver need to be? It's just a small
leaf node hanging off a large existing piece of kernel infrastructure.
> and really, i'm not expecting miracles, i've never seen any hardware
> vendor argue /against/ support for their own hardware =B-)
>
And since when has it been kernel policy to argue against including a
well written, self-contained, vendor-provided driver for a piece of
hardware?
J
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
