On 03/06/2007 02:21 PM, Andi Kleen wrote: >> I believe this was just a quick fix in response to Ingo breaking the VMI >> build yesterday by disabling NO_IDLE_HZ on us. There is no technical >> reason why NO_IDLE_HZ=y can't coexist with NO_HZ. > > Well it's nasty that you force NO_IDLE_HZ on all of paravirt ops users. The only thing NO_IDLE_HZ=y "forces" on other users is some extra code (which you are going to get no matter what with CONFIG_PARAVIRT). It doesn't force them to use this code. It just provides a few extra routines that a paravirt_ops backend might want to call back into (I think both vmi and xen backends use these routines and that is why it became associated with CONFIG_PARAVIRT rather than CONFIG_VMI). _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
