Rusty Russell wrote:
> Actually, your paravirt_patch_insns has similar logic anyway, so this
> code could collapse (it should fall back to paravirt_patch_default tho
> IMHO).
>
I wanted to get rid of the table because its now sparse, and possibly
fairly large (since the special save flags & disable is at offset
0x80). And a switch would be pretty clean anyway.
How does this look? Compiles, but untested.
J
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: paravirt-patch-machinery.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 6956 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20070222/b1bda709/attachment.bin
