Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Zachary Amsden wrote: > >> Ok. As long as we plan on patching CR2 and CR0 / clts accessors for >> FPU save during context switch and page fault paths in the future. >> > > That's up to each backend, right? Or do these need to be patched for a > correctness reason? > No, it needs to be part of the general patch list first, which is still hand listed rather than just any op being patchable. Then it can be up to the backend. Zach
