Zachary Amsden wrote: > I'm not super concerned either, but I still don't like it. There > already is dynamic replacement for vsyscall.so, so you could have just > dropped in an an-note-ated version. Ah, OK. I'll have a look at that. J
Zachary Amsden wrote: > I'm not super concerned either, but I still don't like it. There > already is dynamic replacement for vsyscall.so, so you could have just > dropped in an an-note-ated version. Ah, OK. I'll have a look at that. J