[PATCH 7/7] cleanup: make disable_acpi() valid w/o CONFIG_ACPI

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Applied.

thanks,
-Len

On Sunday 11 February 2007 22:39, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Len Brown <lenb at kernel.org> said:
> > Okay, but better to use disable_acpi()
> > indeed, since this would be the first code not already inside CONFIG_ACPI
> > to invoke disable_acpi(), we could define the inline as empty and you could
> > then scratch the #ifdef too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
> 
> ===================================================================
> --- a/include/asm-i386/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/asm-i386/acpi.h
> @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ extern int acpi_irq_balance_set(char *st
>  #define acpi_ioapic 0
>  static inline void acpi_noirq_set(void) { }
>  static inline void acpi_disable_pci(void) { }
> +static inline void disable_acpi(void) { }
>  
>  #endif	/* !CONFIG_ACPI */
>  
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 


[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux