Andi Kleen wrote: >> The code looks like it's designed to be included from userspace for >> testing; as it compiles without this include (and has no other >> includes), I chose not to add it. >> >> Linus makes a good point, but someone who actually knows the code >> should, y'know, test it and stuff... > > It should use kernel_fpu_begin() imho. If someone wants to test > it in user space again they can add dummy definitions of that > to their user space header. I hadn't seen this thread until now, when Neil pointed me to the thread. Using kernel_fpu_begin() ... kernel_fpu_end() is probably indeed the best option. -hpa
