On Tuesday 12 December 2006 02:22, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > What problem do they cause together? There's certainly no problem with > Xen+vdso This was the change which finally got my test system (with an older SUSE 9.0 based user land to boot). With paravirt older glibc's ld.so otherwise throws assertation failures because it somehow can't deal with the new placement. This only happens with paravirt enabled. Binary compatibility is important. > (in fact, its actually very useful so that it picks up the > right libc with Xen-friendly TLS). AFAIK libc selection comes from the aux vector, not the vdso. -Andi
