[PATCH 1/4] Prep for paravirt: Be careful about touching BIOS address space

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> (Andrew had already taken that last one, I meant to send this)
> 
> Subject: Be careful about touching BIOS address space
> 
> BIOS ROM areas may not be mapped into the guest address space, so be careful
> when touching those addresses to make sure they appear to be mapped.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy at xensource.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
> 
> ===================================================================
> --- a/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -270,7 +270,14 @@ static struct resource standard_io_resou
>  	.flags	= IORESOURCE_BUSY | IORESOURCE_IO
>  } };
>  
> -#define romsignature(x) (*(unsigned short *)(x) == 0xaa55)
> +static inline int romsignature(const unsigned char *x)
> +{
> +     unsigned short sig;
> +     int ret = 0;
> +     if (__get_user(sig, (const unsigned short *)x) == 0)
> +	  ret = (sig == 0xaa55);

Indentation is b0rken here.

And... is get_user right primitive for accessing area that may not be
there?
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux