Per-cpu patches on top of PDA stuff...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 19:49 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Because it makes it easier to write other code? We don't really
> want any unnecessary limiting assumptions in arch/i386 just because
> of some obscure machine with one user.

Really?  I don't see it that way.  I did a lot of work back in 2000/2001
to break x86 of its remapped CPU assumptions ... it's been operating
nicely for 6 years, I don't see a reason to break it now.

Also, as we enter the era of hotplug CPUs, when a non voyager x86 system
tells you CPU3 is overheating, how to you find out exactly which CPU to
hot unplug?

James




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux