proposed interface change for setting the ldt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: proposed interface change for setting the ldt
From: chrisw at sous-sol.org (Chris Wright)
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 20:22:49 -0700
In-reply-to: <44E681B8.3020804@xxxxxxxxxx>

* Zachary Amsden (zach at vmware.com) wrote:
> The paravirt-op just got a lot harder to implement, so there is a cost 
> to the simpler interface.

I'm missing why it's a lot harder.  Seems reasonably straight forward.
puzzled...

-chris

Follow-Ups:
- proposed interface change for setting the ldt
  - From: Zachary Amsden

References:
- proposed interface change for setting the ldt
  - From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- proposed interface change for setting the ldt
  - From: Zachary Amsden
- proposed interface change for setting the ldt
  - From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- proposed interface change for setting the ldt
  - From: Zachary Amsden

Prev by Date: proposed interface change for setting the ldt
Next by Date: proposed interface change for setting the ldt
Previous by thread: proposed interface change for setting the ldt
Next by thread: proposed interface change for setting the ldt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM Development] [Libvirt Development] [Libvirt Users] [CentOS Virtualization] [Netdev] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite Forum] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba]

Powered by Linux