[RFC] First (incomplete) cut of Xen paravirt binding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Jeremy Fitzhardinge (jeremy at goop.org) wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> >The other approach - check for ring != 0 - do generic paravirtualized
> >startup or normal one and then probe later in C seems certainly
> >cleaner.
> 
> Xen supports trusted ring 0 paravirtualized kernels.

That's only for the "single kernel runs on hv and native" AFAIK.  And we
certainly can't require a Xen hypervisor for running on native.  So, I
don't think that has any sane requirements that we should consider.

thanks,
-chris


[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux