[RFC] First (incomplete) cut of Xen paravirt binding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > That's very reasonable, but at the same time:
> > What we don't want to do is have a lot of variation in our domain
> > builder for loading different operating systems for no particular
> > reason.
> 
> Sure.  A reasonable concern.  Do you have an ELF format 
> windows kernel?

Of course not, but we're also not trying to run Windows fully
paravirtualized.

> My point being this is a fundamental point where variation happens.
> No boot-loader has been able to see OS vendors on a single format.
> I don't expect Xen will be able to change this trend.

We've managed to get NetBSD, FreeBSD, Solaris and recently even Plan9 to
agree on using ELF with our __xen_guest section extension.

    Christian



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux