[RFC] First (incomplete) cut of Xen paravirt binding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: [RFC] First (incomplete) cut of Xen paravirt binding
From: jeremy at goop.org (Jeremy Fitzhardinge)
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 13:45:56 -0700
In-reply-to: <44CA6B56.4050904@xxxxxxxxxx>

Zachary Amsden wrote:
> Approaching the problem from the mindset "Xen relies on.." is not 
> always the right thing for Linux.

No, but as the only widely used Linux hypervisor, it does make a good 
body of experience.

    J

References:
- [RFC] First (incomplete) cut of Xen paravirt binding
  - From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [RFC] First (incomplete) cut of Xen paravirt binding
  - From: Rusty Russell
- [RFC] First (incomplete) cut of Xen paravirt binding
  - From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [RFC] First (incomplete) cut of Xen paravirt binding
  - From: Rusty Russell
- [RFC] First (incomplete) cut of Xen paravirt binding
  - From: Eric W. Biederman
- [RFC] First (incomplete) cut of Xen paravirt binding
  - From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [RFC] First (incomplete) cut of Xen paravirt binding
  - From: Eric W. Biederman
- [RFC] First (incomplete) cut of Xen paravirt binding
  - From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [RFC] First (incomplete) cut of Xen paravirt binding
  - From: Zachary Amsden

Prev by Date: [RFC] First (incomplete) cut of Xen paravirt binding
Next by Date: Single PV startup vs multiple PV startup
Previous by thread: [RFC] First (incomplete) cut of Xen paravirt binding
Next by thread: [RFC] First (incomplete) cut of Xen paravirt binding
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM Development] [Libvirt Development] [Libvirt Users] [CentOS Virtualization] [Netdev] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite Forum] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba]

Powered by Linux