Andi Kleen wrote: > It's even better because we currently can't annotate explicit push/pop > for the dwarf2 stack unwinder, and it would cause fallbacks to the > old inexact unwinder. > I guess they also clobber "cc", right? J
Andi Kleen wrote: > It's even better because we currently can't annotate explicit push/pop > for the dwarf2 stack unwinder, and it would cause fallbacks to the > old inexact unwinder. > I guess they also clobber "cc", right? J