On Wednesday 26 July 2006 20:51, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > > It's even better because we currently can't annotate explicit push/pop > > for the dwarf2 stack unwinder, and it would cause fallbacks to the > > old inexact unwinder. > It still needs a push for the argument(s) on stack though. Perhaps we > should make these functions regparam? Yes. Actually I hope soon regparm will be just default for everything soon. -Andi
