Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> what is this for? Isn't this 1) undocumented and 2) unclear and 3)
> ugly ? (I'm pretty sure the HAVE_ARCH_* stuff is highly deprecated for
> new things nowadays)
>
It appears to be completely unnecessary. Xen doesn't use
sanitize_e820_map(), but there's no obvious harm in leaving it there
(and it's init code, so there's no long-term cost).
J
