[PATCH 2/3] Paravirtualization: Abstract sensitive instructions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Paravirtualization: Abstract sensitive instructions
From: ak at suse.de (Andi Kleen)
Date: Tue May 16 10:44:11 2006
In-reply-to: <446A0CF3.10607@xxxxxxxxxx>

> Relying this on current processors is fine, but I 
> don't believe it is guaranteed to never break on future cores.  

It is - unless they implement something else that's not x86.

-Andi

Follow-Ups:
- [PATCH 2/3] Paravirtualization: Abstract sensitive instructions
  - From: Zachary Amsden

References:
- [PATCH 1/3] Paravirtualization: Kernel Ring Cleanups
  - From: Rusty Russell
- [PATCH 2/3] Paravirtualization: Abstract sensitive instructions
  - From: Andi Kleen
- [PATCH 2/3] Paravirtualization: Abstract sensitive instructions
  - From: Zachary Amsden

Prev by Date: [PATCH 2/3] Paravirtualization: Abstract sensitive instructions
Next by Date: [PATCH 2/3] Paravirtualization: Abstract sensitive instructions
Previous by thread: [PATCH 2/3] Paravirtualization: Abstract sensitive instructions
Next by thread: [PATCH 2/3] Paravirtualization: Abstract sensitive instructions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM Development] [Libvirt Development] [Libvirt Users] [CentOS Virtualization] [Netdev] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite Forum] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba]

Powered by Linux