[RFC PATCH 08/35] Add Xen-specific memory management definitions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: [RFC PATCH 08/35] Add Xen-specific memory management definitions
From: Christian.Limpach at cl.cam.ac.uk (Christian Limpach)
Date: Mon May 15 01:19:54 2006
In-reply-to: <20060514234418.65656de9.zaitcev@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 11:44:18PM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> I'm sure you considered this, but decided to be tricky. Why?
> No way to find the safe number of machine pages in a guest?

In addition to wanting to support holes, the number of machine
pages will usually change when you move it to another machine.

    christian

References:
- [RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
  - From: Chris Wright
- [RFC PATCH 08/35] Add Xen-specific memory management definitions
  - From: Chris Wright
- [RFC PATCH 08/35] Add Xen-specific memory management definitions
  - From: Pete Zaitcev

Prev by Date: [RFC PATCH 08/35] Add Xen-specific memory management definitions
Next by Date: [RFC PATCH 16/35] subarch support for interrupt and exception gates
Previous by thread: [RFC PATCH 08/35] Add Xen-specific memory management definitions
Next by thread: [RFC PATCH 08/35] Add Xen-specific memory management definitions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM Development] [Libvirt Development] [Libvirt Users] [CentOS Virtualization] [Netdev] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite Forum] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba]

Powered by Linux