[RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Zachary Amsden (zach@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> No, you don't need to dream up all the possible interface bits ahead of 
> time.  With a la carte interfaces, you can take what you need now, and 
> add features later.  You don't need an ABI for features.  You need it 
> for compatibility.  You will need to update the hypervisor ABI.  And you 
> can't force people to upgrade their kernels.

How do you support an interface that's not already a part of the ABI
w/out changing the kernel?

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux