* Anthony Liguori (aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > Would you have less trouble if the "ROM" were actually more like a > module? Specifically, if it had a proper elf header and symbol table, > used symbols as entry points, and was a GPL interface (so that ROM's had > to be GPL)? Then it's just a kernel module that's hidden in the option > ROM space and has a C interface. Yeah, point is the interface is normal C API, and has the similar free form that normal kernel API's have. thanks, -chris
