[RFC PATCH 07/35] Make LOAD_OFFSET defined by subarch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chris Wright wrote:
> Change LOAD_OFFSET so that the kernel has virtual addresses in the elf header fields.
> 
> Unlike bare metal kernels, Xen kernels start with virtual address
> management turned on and thus the addresses to load to should be
> virtual addresses.
> 

Rather than changing LOAD_OFFSET in Linux, why not leave this alone and 
change the Xen domain builder to properly interpret the ELF program 
header fields?

i.e. with this change, we'd have

p_paddr = __PAGE_OFFSET + segment_offset
p_vaddr = __PAGE_OFFSET + segment_offset
VIRT_BASE = __PAGE_OFFSET

where, the VA mapping p_paddr -> (p_paddr-VIRT_BASE) is established by 
the domain builder.

Instead, why not drop this patch, and the VIRT_BASE portion of the 
__xen_guest section, and instead change Xen's domain builder to treat 
p_paddr and p_vaddr in a more standard way?  Since Xen starts the domain 
with virtual address management enabled, it makes sense for it to use 
p_vaddr to determine the virtual address to load the kernel to.  Then, 
p_paddr could be used to determine which pseudo-physical pages back that 
virtual address range.

i.e. use, just like vanilla linux:

p_paddr = segment_offset
p_vaddr = __PAGE_OFFSET + segment_offset

so these two fields directly indicate the same mapping as before, but 
now in terms of p_vaddr -> p_paddr, which makes sense, and no need for 
the extra VIRT_BASE attribute in the __xen_guest section.

Dan

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux