In-Reply-To: <20060315102522.GA5926@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 10:25:22 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I agree with Zach here, the Xen hypervisor <-> kernel interface is > not very nice. This proposal seems like a step forward althogh it'll > probably need to go through a few iterations. Without and actually > useable opensource hypevisor reference implementation it's totally > unacceptable, though. I'd like to see a test harness implementation that has no actual hypervisor functionality and just implements the VMI calls natively. This could be used to test the interface and would provide a nice starting point for those who want to write a VMI hypervisor. -- Chuck "Penguins don't come from next door, they come from the Antarctic!"
