(no subject)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: (no subject)
From: ak at suse.de (Andi Kleen)
Date: Mon Nov 21 09:29:12 2005
In-reply-to: <31100cb5abcb16617981e6923dd165d0@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

> We could make use of virt_to_machine/machine_to_virt instead, which 

I don't like it because "machine" is quite meaningless outside
Xen. 

-Andi

References:
- (no subject)
  - From: Andi Kleen
- (no subject)
  - From: Keir Fraser

Prev by Date: (no subject)
Next by Date: xen merge tree broken?
Previous by thread: (no subject)
Next by thread: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM Development] [Libvirt Development] [Libvirt Users] [CentOS Virtualization] [Netdev] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite Forum] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba]

Powered by Linux