Phone meeting about kernel virtualization hooks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 28 September 2005 23:15, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) 
wrote:
> > > Another useful dichotomy would be to separate the changes
> > > that are required for Xen into two buckets:  Changes/files
> > > that impact existing Linux files, and files that (eventually)
> > > end up in a subdirectory that is distinct from any
> > > existing Linux subdirectory.  Presumably the latter class
> > > will not require (nearly as much) review.
> >
> > It depends. Some maintainers like for network device
> > drivers have pretty high requirements. Best to submit it to
> > them early.
>
> Hmmm... would the network maintainer have (or want to
> have) purview over a virtual network driver that is in
> drivers/xen/net{front,back}?

I would guess so, yes. It should be certainly reviewed on netdev.

-Andi

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux