* zach@xxxxxxxxxx (zach@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > Attempt to fix the UML build by assuming the default i386 subarchitecture > (mach-default). > > I can't fully test this because spinlock breakage is still happening in > my tree, but it gets rid of the mach_xxx.h missing file warnings. I assume this is intended to fix a build error caused by patches in the earlier set which added more reliance on mach-default? thanks, -chris
