[PATCH 2/12] ldt-accessors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Zachary Amsden (zach@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> Chris Wright wrote:

Did you pick up the missing segment_is_ldt() conversion?

> >Any compelling reason not to use _s * LDT_ENTRY_SIZE ?
> 
> Actually, yes.  That requires sizeof(*_s) == sizeof(char), which gives 
> no type checking against struct desc_struct.  The lack of type checking 
> and easily wrong pointer path as a result is one of the things I've been 
> cleaning up.

OK, good point, thanks,
-chris

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux