Hi,
On Friday 13 December 2013 12:01 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> In case pm_runtime_get*() fails, it still
> increments pm usage counter, so we *must*
> make sure to pm_runtime_put() even in those
> cases.
But shouldn't the fix be in pm_runtime_get()?
Cheers
Kishon
>
> This patch fixes that mistake the same way
> usbcore treats those possible failures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/phy/phy-core.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
> index 03cf8fb..5b61123 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
> @@ -94,19 +94,27 @@ static struct phy_provider *of_phy_provider_lookup(struct device_node *node)
>
> int phy_pm_runtime_get(struct phy *phy)
> {
> + int ret;
> +
> if (!pm_runtime_enabled(&phy->dev))
> return -ENOTSUPP;
>
> - return pm_runtime_get(&phy->dev);
> + ret = pm_runtime_get(&phy->dev);
> + if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINPROGRESS)
> + pm_runtime_put_noidle(&phy->dev);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(phy_pm_runtime_get);
>
> int phy_pm_runtime_get_sync(struct phy *phy)
> {
> + int ret;
> +
> if (!pm_runtime_enabled(&phy->dev))
> return -ENOTSUPP;
>
> - return pm_runtime_get_sync(&phy->dev);
> + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&phy->dev);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + pm_runtime_put_sync(&phy->dev);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(phy_pm_runtime_get_sync);
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
