On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 09:20:07AM +0000, dt.tangr@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Daniel Tang <dt.tangr@xxxxxxxxx> > > The SoC name was mistakenly used instead of the vendor name in the > device tree binding for nspire-usb. > > This patch fixes this before the driver becomes widely adopted. How widely adopted is it so far? I can't see the binding in mainline yet. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Tang <dt.tangr@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci-hdrc-nspire.txt | 4 ++-- > drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_nspire.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci-hdrc-nspire.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci-hdrc-nspire.txt > index 5ba8e90..ef1fcbf 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci-hdrc-nspire.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci-hdrc-nspire.txt > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ > * TI-Nspire USB OTG Controller > > Required properties: > -- compatible: Should be "zevio,nspire-usb" > +- compatible: Should be "lsi,nspire-usb" Surely this should be lsi,zevio-usb, matching the lsi,zevio-timer binding? Thanks, Mark. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
