On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 06:49:56PM +0530, Majunath Goudar wrote: > From: Manjunath Goudar <manjunath.goudar@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Suspend scenario in case of OHCI was not properly > handled in ochi_suspend()routine. Alan Stern > suggested, properly handle OHCI suspend scenario. > > This does generic proper handling of suspend > scenario to all OHCI SOC. > > V1->V2: > - No change. > Due to build failure on ep93xx reverted this patch. This patch is > needed as Alan mentioned, it is having common ohci suspend features > w/o this following patches(still in usb-next) are not useful. > > Commit id "10abfa13"[PATCH 7/11] Properly handle ohci-omap suspend. > Commit id "39dbd7df"[PATCH 8/11] Properly handle ohci-platform suspend. > Commit id "4ceaa893"[PATCH 9/11] Properly handle ohci-pxa suspend. > Commit id "f3c60599"[PATCH 10/11] Properly handle ohci-sm501 suspend. > > > Signed-off-by: Manjunath Goudar <manjunath.goudar@xxxxxxxxxx> This is an invalid email address, please don't continue to use it, I'm tired of seeing the bounce response :( And "v2" for this series? Really? I seem to recall many different versions of the series, so we should be on a much higher number by now... How have you tested these patches? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
