On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Hartley Sweeten <HartleyS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Monday, October 14, 2013 1:50 PM, Alan Stern wrote: >> On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, Hartley Sweeten wrote: >>> As an alternative to this patch, I have successfully used the ohci-platform >>> driver on the ep93xx. This does move a bit of glue code into the ep93xx >>> core (arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/core.c) but it removes the ohci-ep93xx glue >>> driver completely. >>> >>> I can post a patch for this shortly if you would like. >> >> That would be great! It would save me the trouble of fixing >> Manjanuth's patch and it would remove a source file too! > > The only thing I'm not sure about use where to enable the > USB_OHCI_HCD_PLATFORM driver for ARCH_EP93XX. > > Right now the ohci-ep93xx glue driver is enabled automatically > when USB_OHCI_HCD is enabled due to the ifdefery. I can add > a new config option similar to the other users of > USB_OHCI_HCD_PLATFORM but I was wondering if there is a > cleaner way. Given that we're trying to reduce code under arch/arm and move it out to driver directories instead, I'm not sure this is a step in the right direction. :-) I guess it depends on how much code we're talking about here, so let's take that discussion once patches are posted. -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
