On 10/10/2013 07:39 AM, Ming Lei wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@xxxxxx> wrote: >> You are correct I don't expect a match for PnP devices only devices that are hard wired. >> >> After thinking of it I should move the OF code below the EEPROM code as the EEPROM should take preference over the DT code. >> >> I will need to post V2 for that. > Your patch still doesn't deal with two smsc95xx devices built in > one board. Is there a board that has 2 built in smsc devices? This is all dependent on what the dev.id is of udev. > > The problem is a generic one, looks it is better to do it when OF supports > discoverable bus. > > > Thanks, -- ------------------ Dan Murphy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
