On 10/03/2013 03:29 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 04:41:53PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote: >> On 10/02/2013 04:11 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 04:11:30PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote: >>>> Hi Felipe, >>>> >>>> On 09/18/2013 03:49 PM, Roger Quadros wrote: >>>>> "usb_otg_ss_refclk960m" is an optional functional clock to the >>>>> UBS_OTG_SS module. So manage it in the driver. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Just realized that "usb_otg_ss_refclk960m" is in fact functional clock to the >>>> PHY and not USB_OTG_SS module. The name is misleading. >>>> >>>> So please ignore patch 9 and 10. >>> >>> ignored. All others are fine, right ? >>> >> Yes. But I might have to rebase this on top of Phy framework stuff. > > alright, Greg already took the PHY framework, so maybe we need to just > give him my Acked-by and he takes the patches directly as I don't have > PYH framework. > OK. I'll resend this series to Greg in a while. cheers, -roger -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
