Hi, On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 02:00:59AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:17:38AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > On Wednesday 18 September 2013 19:03:33 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > &twl->phy.notifier is not initalized > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-twl4030-usb.c > > > > b/drivers/usb/phy/phy-twl4030-usb.c index 8f78d2d..efe6155 > > > > 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-twl4030-usb.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/phy/phy-twl4030-usb.c > > > > @@ -705,6 +705,8 @@ static int twl4030_usb_probe(struct > > > > platform_device *pdev) if (device_create_file(&pdev->dev, > > > > &dev_attr_vbus)) dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "could not create sysfs > > > > file\n"); > > > > > > > > + ATOMIC_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&twl->phy.notifier); > > > > + > > > > /* Our job is to use irqs and status from the power module > > > > * to keep the transceiver disabled when nothing's > > > > connected. * > > > > > > I sent above patch week ago. Did you already included it? > > > > look at my testing branch. > > Felipe prefers you to go MAINTAINERS file for > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/balbi/usb.git > > entry. After few clicks, you'll find out your two patches in > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/balbi/usb.git/log/?h=testing > > . So yes, it seems that after 10+ flames Felipe was _not_ lazy to > send, "Thanks for a patch" mail was too much work. > > Apparently, we'll need Documentation/HowToBeGoodMaintainer file... I only send my automated emails after properly testing them. They sit in 'testing' for as long as necessary. After all the test is done, they'll be moved to 'next' at which point you get your email notification and they reach linux-next for the next day. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
