Hi Oleksij, On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Oleksij Rempel <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Arokux, > > Allan already pointed on timing issue. If you compare bad and working > logs you will see that interval on bad log is match more shorter. On my > expiriance with other wifi adapter it is critical. Beside, it has > nothing todo with wifi at all. > In many cases usb controller insight of adapter is produced by some > other company. For example faraday-tech which produce FUSB200, > FUSB220,.. IP cores. > > If interval is less then hardware can handle, it can overfill FIFOs on > endpoints. If firmware can't handle this error, then device will be just > unresponsive. thanks for the explanation. The hardware is the same in both cases. So the only difference is in software. What do you think can influence such difference in timing on software side? Maybe some clock has higher frequency then it should? Best regards, Arokux -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
