On Thu, 29 Aug 2013, Ming Lei wrote: > > In the end, this comes down to a decision about priorities. Do you > > want to give higher priority to new events or to givebacks? Overall, I > > don't think it matters. > > If possible, the events should be put higher priority, like events > handling in ehci_irq() now, but as you said, it may not matter. > > So from the discussion, both approaches are pretty much same > I have no objection if anyone plan to implement this approach. Good. At this point, I don't think anybody is planning to do it. But just in case somebody does, I would prefer not to remove the code that handles races between processing and submission. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
