On 08/19/2013 05:50 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi:375: compatible = "mg,musbmhdrc"; >>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi:430: compatible = "mg,musbmhdrc"; >>> >>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/dbx5x0.dtsi:181: "mentor,musb"; >>> >>> Should both be documented? Should the bindings for those devices be >>> unified on one vendor prefix, with the old one perhaps still documented >>> as deprecated depending on how long it's been around? >> >> I wasn't aware of the dbx5x0 mentor,usb binding. As far as the am33xx >> is concerned, it has been prepared for the next merge window and can be >> changed. > > OK, changing it to mentor, seems simplest and most convenient then. Okay. >> However the mentor,usb binding isn't documented either. > > Presumably you can just adjust this patch to document it. Okay. That means if we stick to that hierarchy given my dbx5x0 (which makes sense after thinking for a while) I'm going to shift my devices a little to fit this. Once this is done I document it and post patches. Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
