On Saturday 17 August 2013 12:19 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
On Sat, 17 Aug 2013, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
On Saturday 17 August 2013 12:30 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 12:18:42AM +0530, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
Removed struct xhci_hcd from xhci_readl fucntion as it's no more in use.
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci.h | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.hthe
index c338741..7cf0e41 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
@@ -1598,8 +1598,7 @@ static inline struct usb_hcd *xhci_to_hcd(struct
xhci_hcd *xhci)
/* TODO: copied from ehci.h - can be refactored? */
/* xHCI spec says all registers are little endian */
-static inline unsigned int xhci_readl(const struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
- __le32 __iomem *regs)
+static inline unsigned int xhci_readl(__le32 __iomem *regs)
And you broke the build :(
Sorry, that's not ok.
greg k-h
I'm writing patch to change function definition along with changes in program
files where this function is called.
After changing all files i built the module and it compiled as well.
There were 6 files which were using xhci_read. I fixed all the calls and
compiled.
Am i missing anything? Please suggest then i'll send patches again
I haven't followed along in detail, but I think Greg wants one patch that
fixes both the definition and all of the calls, and not one patch for each
file.
julia
yeah i understand that now. I wasn't aware of this before, i thought a
series of patch would be required for multiple files. My bad. I'm
resending in single patch
Regards
Kumar gaurav
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
